The comments on the Cheerios Facebook page have become much more positive since the announcement a few days ago that the cereal brand would use only non-genetically-modified ingredients in its original cereal.
Said one: Thank you Cheerios for deciding to make your cereal GMO free! I stopped buying it for my family to eat because it wasn’t GMO free but once you have changed it to GMO free I will buy it again because my son especially loved your cheerios! It’s nice to have a brand we can trust again!
Give us more non-GMO options, requested another. You need to remove GMOs from all your cereals not just one, We used to buy the Apple Cinnamon Cheerios and will again when they are free of GMOs.
A few dozen Facebook plaudits are nice, but they arent the reason General Mills spent nearly a year adjusting its sourcing and manufacturing processes so as to be able to claim a mass-market cereal free of GMO ingredients. General Mills problem, and that of other major food corporations, has been that they have been fighting their customers, and losing business in the process.
An anti-GMO site has for many months pushed General Mills to discontinue including GMO ingredients in Cheerios:Breakfast is not a science experiment! it said. The Organic Consumers Association called for a boycott of Kelloggs Kashi cereal brand because of allegations the supposedly natural cereal includes GMO ingredients.
Now, I’m not a fan of any of these cereals because of the processing involved in creating them, not to mention the added sugar in most. But I do know that smart business executives dont fight their customers…..except when their companies are so big, they think they can ignore customer concerns. And that is the only explanation I can come up with for why the big food corporations have invested millions fighting GMO (genetically modified organism) labeling initiatives in California and Washington.
Consider: An estimated 40% of American farmland is planted with Monsanto seeds. Four companiesGeneral Mills, Kelloggs, Pepsico, and Kraft Foods–are estimated to control more than 80% of the $10 billion breakfast cereal market.
But even having such clear market dominance doesnt provide absolute protection against the vagaries of competition. General Mills has seen its cereal sales stagnate. Kelloggs late last year announced a seven per cent workforce reduction by 2017 because of weakening cereal sales, apparently due in part to the Organic Consumers Association boycott of Kashi.
Then there were the cracks that had begun to appear in the food industrys seemingly united opposition to GMO labeling. Upscale Whole Foods, seeing competitive advantage in the controversy, announced last March that it has adopted a policy that will require labeling of all foods sold in its stores containing GMO ingredients by 2018. While noting that the labeling wont be a simple task for some suppliers, Whole Foods trumpeted the fact that it is the first national grocery chain to set a deadline for full GMO transparency.
Whole Foods reference to the complexity of the change indicates how far the U.S. has gone down the road toward embracing GMO foods–something General Mills elaborates on in its explanation for the differences in GMO penetration in the U.S. versus Europe: Cheerios in Europe do not use genetically modified ingredients. But the agriculture and regulatory environments in Europe and the U.S. are quite different….Almost half of the cropland in the U.S. is used to grow genetically modified crops, and 70 to 80 percent of the foods in the average grocery store likely contain GMOs. In Europe, there is a national standard for labeling non-GM ingredients, and the grain supply is very different.
Turning around the GMO battleship in the U.S. will be a gargantuan task. But all indications are that the consumer concerns about GMOs run wide and deep. The anxiety may not be entirely based on objective science, as a lengthy report in todays New York Times about Hawaiis debate on the subject makes clear. It may well be based in significant measure on all the previous food problems that have come to light in the absence of official scientific concerns–poison pesticides, misused antibiotics, CAFO pollution, questionable additives and colorings, over-use of sugar and salt, etc., etc.. Perception shapes reality.
In terms of the General Mills move, if Cheerios gets a sales boost, other large corporations will feel compelled to take similar action, and the battleship will turn. The marketplace still carries a lot of weight. People often dont realize how much power they and their wallets hold.
As for the absurd hatchet job in the NYT (always one of Monsanto’s most ardent media supporters) and the lies it’s telling, how disgusting to see it favorably cited here. That’s why the food movement’s going to be destroyed – because everyone insists on hanging separately. This movement has zero consciousness or solidarity. It’s shameful.
To give just one example of the lies of the piece, the Seralini study was not only never “debunked”, on the contrary it’s by far the best study on GMOs which has ever been done, and its results stand as the best we have. It was retracted as an exercise in censorship, under intense pressure from Monsanto and after the journal was forced to accept a Monsanto cadre onto its editorial board. That does indeed constitute “debunking” by corporate media standards.
That would be the same NYT which says raw milk is unsafe. I guess if David’s telling us the NYT is a reliable source on agriculture and food, he’s saying we’ll have to think twice about raw milk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XHvCoGCX_E
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/how-many-steps-does-it-take-to-make-msg.html
http://www.joe.org/joe/2013december/comm2.php
Organic agriculture has performed remarkably well without much help from University Extension Services. The organic model has much to teach Extension agents and specialists.
Now, as in how to best produce raw milk as safely as possible, it is organic farmers mostly figuring it out on their own with only a little help from universities.
Grass to the Glass: Raw Milk and Informed Consumer Choice.
Joseph R. Heckman, Plant Biology & Pathology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
http://a-c-s.confex.com/crops/2011asa/webprogram/Paper69539.html
“the cultivation of knowledge is as much about the cultivation of trust as it is about the cultivation of truth”
Absolutely. I tend to distrust information coming from dubious sources even when it sounds right.
There is a distinct parallel between Organic farming and Raw milk. No one can rationally deny that just a couple of centuries ago, there was no obesity problem and very little cancer. You can promote the benefits of the industrial age all you want but while some modern developments have clearly contributed to the quality of human life such as cars, planes, TV (?) computers and the internet, they also have some disturbing side effects not always seen by the newer fast food generations.
“a difference between experience-based knowledge and experiment-based knowledge” is a good way of putting it for the scientific community. Every man is in some way my superior in that I can learn of him is good food for thought.
To Russ: I had never heard of the Seralini study before your comment here, including (mercifully) the response to it by the big-ag central-control boys, but I’m into it now. It is indeed a whopper of a story.
Now I hope Russ, that you take care to not allow your obviously acute vision to make you angry or disappointed. Take the time often to refresh yourself by turning to look at the goodness that abounds in creation, especially toward those who reflect that goodness by putting the needs of others before their own (as you do for us by helping us see through the fog).
http://www.joe.org/joe/2013december/comm2.php
What do they mean by land-grant?
What are land-grant university agents?
Or land-grant research and Extension agents?
Who are these researchers?
And agricultural professionals?
What are the Extension efforts?
And programs?
And University Extension Services ?
Who are these organic farmers that hold meetings?
This article:
https://a-c-s.confex.com/crops/2011asa/webprogram/Paper69539.html
says poor quality milk cannot be safely consumed by people in raw form. But there is no evidence proving pasteurization improves the safety of poor quality milk.
Herbicide-resistant wheat?
Enhancement of Agronomic Traits of Crop Plants
http://www.ewijst.org/issues/vol_4/ewijst040012986.pdf
Sodium azide creates point mutation in the genome of plants through metabolite and thus produced protein in mutant plants has different function compared to the normal plants. The mutant plants produced by the treatment of sodium azide are capable to survive under various adverse conditions and have improved yields, increased stress tolerance, longer shelf life and reduced agronomic input in comparison to normal plants.
I’m not saying I’m smarter because I don’t use an EBT card, I’m saying I don’t purchase junk foods like Cheerios because I don’t want to support the companies who produce that kind of product. I don’t want rodent hairs and bug parts in my bowl because it jeopardizes the goodness of my RAW MILK ……. 😉
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14501066
Important methods to artificially induce mutations are the use of chemical and physical agents. Most chemical mutagens are alkylating agents and azides. Physical mutagens include electromagnetic radiation, such as gamma rays, X rays, and UV light, and particle radiation, such as fast and thermal neutrons, beta and alpha particles. Mutagenic treatment of seeds is the most convenient and, therefore, the standard method in seed propagated crops. Besides seed treatment, whole plants, cuttings, tubers, pollen, bulbs, corms, or in vitro plants or tissues can be treated.
Mutation breeding is the process of exposing seeds to chemicals or radiation in order to generate mutants with desirable traits to be bred with other cultivars. Plants created using mutagenesis are sometimes called mutagenic plants or mutagenic seeds. From 19302007 more than 2540 mutagenic plant varietals have been released that have been derived either as direct mutants (70%) or from their progeny (30%). Crop plants account for 75% of released mutagenic species with the remaining 25% ornamentals or decorative plants
…
In the debate over Genetically Modified foods, the use of transgenic processes is often compared and contrasted with mutagenic processes. … mutagenic plants and their role on human food systems is less well known, with one journalist writing “Though poorly known, radiation breeding has produced thousands of useful mutants and a sizable fraction of the worlds crops…including varieties of rice, wheat, barley, pears, peas, cotton, peppermint, sunflowers, peanuts, grapefruit, sesame, bananas, cassava and sorghum.” Mutagenic varieties tend to be made freely available for plant breeding….
…
Unlike genetically modified crops, which typically involve the insertion of one or two target genes, plants developed via mutagenic processes with random, multiple and unspecific genetic changes have been discussed as a concern but are not prohibited by any nation’s organic standards. Somewhat controversially, several organic food and seed companies promote and sell certified organic products that were developed using both chemical and nuclear mutagenesis.
I am extremely thankful for your effort and I admire your optimism.
These are good articles in that they serve to deconstruct the current system and hopefully bring about a measure of change.
Educating the consumer and developing an atmosphere of trust although, what would seem an almost impossible task is imperative.
At this point however biased corporate influence vis-à-vis government and post secondary education on the minds of these extension agents and specialists is huge.
They have acquired a status quo or mindset if you will that interferes with their ability to be objective and non-partisan.
They have failed to safeguard the organic farmers interests and have turned a blind eye to unscrupulous tactics advertently or inadvertently designed to undermine the principles of organic farming.
Their endorsement of GMOs, glyphosate, and nicotine-based pesticides with little regard for their overall toxic effect on humans, animals, aquatic life and insects etc. are a case in point.
Please forgive my cynicism. It hasnt matured to the point where I have lost all hope.
Ken
For anyone who’s interested, here’s two pieces I wrote about the Seralini retraction.
http://attempter.wordpress.com/2013/11/29/monsantos-gleichschaltung-of-peer-review-proceeds-the-seralini-study-is-retracted/
http://attempter.wordpress.com/2013/11/30/more-on-seralini-and-science/
Dave,
I share your appreciation of Russ’ observations and insights. In fact, at his encouragement recently, I have been exploring further the motives and strategy of the American Cheese Society’s collaboration with the FDA, and will have a post about it shortly.
As for his critique of this post (the first comment following the post), I may well have given more credit than it deserved to the NY Times article I linked to. I’m not sure I agree with his resulting conclusion that the food movement “has zero consciousness or solidarity.” It definitely is fragmented, and often contradictory. Whether it is doomed to fail, as he suggests, is another matter. The corporations, aided by government, have certainly had their way, and have accomplished much of their agenda. But they are showing some concern, as evidenced by the Cheerios move, among a number of moves.
http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/blog/post/Fakethrough!-GMOs-and-the-Capitulation-of-Science-Journalism.aspx
Penetrating, thorough, analysis of how the major media cover news about GMO “advances”. (This is the same article Joseph Heckman links to, except this is from the original source, and properly credits the author.)
“Imagine if the New York Times or NBC published, under appropriately scathing headlines, a full and detailed analysis of how GMO corporations perennially manipulate the scientific literature? And then Fox News reported the real story of how the FDA, advised by its own scientists that GMOs should receive close scrutiny, took the purely political and probably illegal decision to disregard that advice? And then each story was picked up by all the other radio, print and TV news outlets? Customers would rebel, political support would disappear (not least because this would discredit the official policy information democratic representatives receive) and the industry would probably collapse. Consequently, the agbiotech industry must make sure such a scenario never happens.”
http://www.independentsciencenews.org/science-media/fakethrough-gmos-and-the-capitulation-of-science-journalism/#more-1854
Wheat Belly by William Davis MD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qT3kVYr4Xo
http://harvardmagazine.com/2011/04/greatest-hits-solzhenitsyn
You can access Solzhenitsyn 1978 Harvard address in pdf format by clicking on the link at the bottom of the page.
Ken
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jsi3RlWz48
Power play.
I’d rather eat a bale of hay with a little whisky poured over it.
I tend to feel as this gal does: http://ideas.time.com/2013/01/23/whats-your-wheat-problem/
‘Nuff said.
…
Herbicide-resistant wheat? Non – GMO
http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/2011/07/herbicide-resistant-wheat/
Unlike genetically modified crops, which typically involve the insertion of one or two target genes, plants developed via mutagenic processes with random, multiple and unspecific genetic changes have been discussed as a concern but are not prohibited by any nation’s organic standards. Somewhat controversially, several organic food and seed companies promote and sell certified organic products that were developed using both chemical and nuclear mutagenesis.
GMO’s should not be our only concern.
Hey, if you want to believe his “theory” (and that’s all it is) about wheat, you do that. I, however, do not believe ALL the hype.
A good tear-apart of his book. 🙂 http://noglutennoproblem.blogspot.com/2012/03/wheat-belly-busted.html
Your bale of hay with some whiskey poured over it reminds me of one of our very effective cures for strep mastitis. We use garlic cloves soaked in very cheap vodka for 28 days. This garlic tincture works like a charm when given orally to cows on our protocol. I am convinced that this concoction just scares the mastitis right out of her body.
Just sayin
I just wanted to mention that I am encouraged by the apparently growing consumer demand for non-GMO foods. Where we struggle most with avoiding GMOs is in our livestock feeds. We are committed to sourcing our feeds locally or at least regionally, and it is quite difficult for us to find non-GMO alfalfa here, even though we live in alfalfa-farm central. We do have certified organic growers, but most of those crops are pre-purchased by certified organic dairies in the Central Valley. So as a tiny farm, sourcing our feed locally, and from organic and/or non-GMO is a challenge.
As a result of our quest of local and non-GMO, we’ve had to be a little creative in formulating our cows’ diets. We feed none of the traditional grain or soy, as neither grow here. Barley has become our preferred grain because it is grown locally and is (as yet) not GMO’d. We’ve also taken to sprouting it using a fodder system. We cut as much of our own grass hay as possible, and that just leaves the alfalfa hay to find from an organic farmer. My hope is that as consumer demand increases, the quest for non-GMO livestock feed may become a little easier. Of course, our organic alfalfa farme, who agreed to sell us the small quantity that we needed gets lots of hugs and thanks and all the raw milk he wants!
Taking a cow out of the milk line and putting several calves on her seems to work quite well. If you don.t happen to have any calves however several young wiener pigs will do just as well.
Ken
I heard a rumor lately that a certain University is finding that cheese made from cows on mainly grass diets has 4 times more Conjugated Linoleic Acid. Apparently they’re doing tests to find out how much barley grass fodder as a supplement, contributes to CLA in milk. I am most interested to communicate with people who know anything about this
Happy cows. Now what could be better for a dairy operation!
http://cookingupastory.com/tranthams-sustainable-12-aprils-dairy-grazing-program
At the bottom of the page in the link above, there is a “related stories” section. I could spend weeks reading/watching all the things offered at those links. Every single one of those had something important to offer to friends of mine who dairy, or even just scaled down and used for home gardening or chicken farming or whatever you’re into. Even if they couldn’t use the specific idea conveyed in the article(s), they would modify it for their own use. I’m sure others, like yourself, could do the same. You know how it is – one idea leads to another idea leads to another idea . . . the domino effect.
As to the homeopathic uses of garlic and other things, I use them a lot for myself and my family, and my brother was a mostly holistic vet (now retired) and recommends the use of the homeopathic staph/strep tinctures or decoctions, as well as many forms of homeopathic herbs. Olive Leaf is one he used a lot, too, and so do I. A lot of people pooh-pooh holistic and homeopathic things (whether for people or animals) but I’ve always found them to be quite useful, and I never discount the idea of anything until I’ve given it a fair shake. As well, what works for me might not work for someone else (same as with bigmedicine although they want us all to fit into the same box whether you’re a 6 # baby or a 200# man) and it’s the same for animals, so more than one remedy may have to be tried to find the bell-ringer!
I also may have posted this article here before, and even though the main focus is pigs, there’s no reason why some of what is talked about couldn’t be utilized for cows, poultry, goats – whatever. It’s interesting and may offer some ideas. http://www.cornucopia.org/2013/07/avocado-fed-pork-why-animal-feed-is-going-gourmet/#more-9221
Soooooo many possibilities!
I don’t have any data to suggest that our cows make more milk on the fodder, but they milk well on it. We started feeding in back in August and slowly have reduced their rolled grain intake. Now, we are feeding no rolled grain, and 2 fodder biscuits per cow, along with all the alfalfa and grass hay they can eat. So far, so good. They are milking steadily…no dramatic rise or fall in production…and they look great. The milk tastes wonderful with no off flavor. The Fodder is so sweet. My kids eat it by the handfuls. 🙂
As for butter fat, I’m not sure if there has been a change because we have never regularly tested for that. Last month, we ran our first milk component test, and it came back 5.98 for butter fat and 4.55 for protein. So high, but whether do to fodder I can’t say.
Chico State University’s organic dairy is running extensive fodder testing. They are about 2 hours south of me, and I am watching their program with great interest. The best part about the fodder system for us is that is allows us the source more of our feed locally. Our fodder seed is grown in a designated field that we contract for with a local farmer. He makes 2x the amount he would if selling to the elevator, and that still gives us a great price, less than if we purchased from the elevator. Its a win-win. Plus…he gets hugs and thanks every time he brings us a load of seed!
I don’t yet have photos on our website of the fodder system. But you are welcome to email me through the address provided there if you have more questions. http://www.kidcreekpastures.com
The makeup of a healthy female microbiome is particularly interesting: newborns are bathed in maternal flora during birth, and breastfed infants receive further maternal microbes through breast milk. Both these aspects of early infant life – vaginal delivery and breastfeeding – have been associated with better lifetime health.
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Strange+world+therapy+anti+detox/9363655/story.html
Humm It sounds like they have inadvertently reinforced the Gabriella and Parsafil studies?
On another note however the above article should settle this notion that milk coming out of a cows udder is sterile.
When secreted into the udder milk is indeed sterile. However following secretion and as it works it way down into the ducts it gradually becomes inoculated with microbes. This is a natural ongoing process whereby microbes from a variety of sources, primarily from the soil and the animals fecal matter, gain entry into the udder in order to establish a natural internal flora.
This natural flora that exists inside a cows udder is of vital importance to her, her overall udder health and the health of her offspring or anyone who should happen to consume the milk.
This natural internal udder flora is what keeps everything in balance. If this floral balance is compromised for whatever reason whether it is via, injury, stress or the use of toxic antibacterials, then complications and problems are certain to arise. This is why I am so strongly opposed to using antiseptic udder washes, teat dips, insecticides, hormones and especially antibiotics for dry cow treatment.
If you undermine the internal balance from the teat end, into the internal structure of the udder, is one not opening the door to a virulent microorganism whether bacterial or fungal in nature to gain entry and take over that environment and cause complications?
The prophylactic use of long acting wide spectrum antibiotics, which in theory, are designed to destroy all living bacteria inside the udder of a cow is a big mistake as far as I am concerned. I know that they know that they are pushing the limit and that it does not always work and when it doesnt work you have got a serious problem on your hands. You will either inherit a real sick cow, an untreatable chronic case mastitis, or a new mutated antibiotic resistant microbe.
I think we need to be very careful not to go overboard in our attempt to control the presence of microorganisms in milk or for that mater, our overall ecosystems.
Think natural!
Ken
http://www.progressivedairy.com/index.php?option=com_content&id=10359%3Atwo-dairymen-are-making-profits-with-sprout-fodder-systems&Itemid=72
Buckminster Fuller educated us about the time lag in various industries. He illustrated by showing that an innovation in building personal dwellings took half a century. I first saw this barley fodder sprouting system at the PNE in 1963, demonstrated by veterinarian Murray Smith. Then, farmers were not interested. Today, it’s a component in the salvation of the family farm. “It’s not that they won’t come around, it’s that they’re slow to come around”
Sprout chambers are a perfect example of “disruptive technology” as well as “Small is Beautiful” = enabling local artisanal dairies to outflank the dinosaurs = the monster faktories = by delivering a high-quality product which is simply not possible, in a CAFO. Trudging-along in their rut, head down – obsessed with making the payment to the usurers – farmers trapped in the commerical system, accepting what they’re told by Mon~Satan, et al. will be the last to know.
http://milkgenomics.org/article/purpose-spilled-milk/?utm_source=Newsletter_Jan2014&utm_campaign=SPLASHjan2014&utm_medium=email
Another article published by our good friends at IMGC UC Davis explained that researchers found more than 700 kinds of bacteria in healthy raw breast milk!!
Going further, the IMGC found that breast milk contains very specialized oligosaccaride sugars. These specialized sugars are not digestible by the infant. They instead only feed one type of bifido bacterium in the maturing infant gut and starves the rest….thereby very actively and very selectively encouraging good bacteria while starving out bad bacteria!!
Nestle, Carnations, Infomil and all of the rest of the fake baby food makers think that they can feed a baby right. They have been feeding bad bacteria all along!!! What a gut-genomics screw-up!!
They have about 100 million years more to go before they can duplicate mother natures grandest mammalian and most successful experiment!!
Totally agree….stay natural!
Homeopathy is too directly opposed to old opinions, and can therefore not be judged by them. Being founded on experience, it can be demonstrated by experience alone. http://hpathy.com/past-present/history-of-homeopathy-3/
Introducing pasteurization, antibacterials, antibiotics and other toxic drugs and compounds into the equation, compromises the health and life giving qualities of natures perfect food.
From an article entitled Is Raw Milk Safe here is what the author has to say.
Raw milk contains lactoperoxidase which uses small amounts of H2O2 and free radicals to seek out and destroy bacteria. Interestingly other countries are looking at using lactoperoxidase instead of pasteurization to ensure the safety of commercial milk as well as for preserving other foods.
Raw milk contains lactoferrin which steals iron away from pathogens and carries it through the gut wall into the blood stream and uses it to stimulate the immune system. Lactoferrin will kill a wide range of pathogens but does not kill beneficial gut bacteria. In fact, in a study involving mice bred to be susceptible to tuberculosis, treatment with lactoferrin significantly reduced the burden of tuberculosis organisms.
Raw milk contains B-lymphocytes which kill foreign bacteria and call in other parts of the immune system for support.
Raw milk contains macrophages which engulf foreign proteins and bacteria.
Raw milk contains neutrophils which kill infected cells and mobilize other parts of the immune system.
Raw milk contains T-lymphocytes that will multiply if bad bacteria are present and produce immune-strengthening compounds.
Raw milk contains Immunoglobulins (IgM, IgA, IgG1, IgG2) which transfer immunity. This is especially helpful if you purchase milk from a local source as the cow/goat will build immunities to local bacteria, virus, and allergens which will then be passed through the milk.
Raw milk contains antibodies which bind to foreign microbes to prevent them from migrating outside the gut and initiate immune response.
Raw milk contains polysaccharides which encourage the growth of good bacteria in the gut and protect the gut wall.
Raw milk contains oligosaccharides which protect other components from being destroyed by stomach acids and enzymes; bind to bacteria and prevent them from attaching to the gut lining; and other functions just being discovered.
Raw milk contains medium-chain fatty acids and enzymes which disrupt cell walls of bad bacteria.
Raw milk contains hormones and growth factors (natural ones – not the added synthetic kind) which stimulate maturation of gut cells and prevent leaky gut.
Raw milk contains mucins which adhere to bacteria and viruses, preventing those organisms from attaching to the mucosa and causing disease.
Raw milk contains fibronectin which increases anti-microbial activity of macrophages and helps to repair damaged tissues.
Raw milk contains glycomacropeptide which inhibits bacterial/viral adhesion, suppresses gastric secretion, and promotes bifido-bacterial growth.
Raw milk contains B12 binding protein which reduces vitamin B12 in the colon which harmful bacteria need for growth.
Raw milk contains bifidus factor which promotes the growth of Lactobacillus bifidus, a helpful bacteria which helps crowd out dangerous germs.
Raw milk contains beneficial bacteria like Lactobacilli and bifidus bacteria which crowd out bad bacteria and produce lactic acid that kills bad bacteria.
http://livingawholelife.blogspot.ca/2009/01/is-raw-milk-safe.html
I would assume that the above information is more or less true. Thus it reinforces what most of us already understand and know to be true with respect to raw milk consumption Keep it natural!
Ken
If only . . .
The american people don’t have anyone with the brains or the brawn to do this.
http://libertypenblog.blogspot.com/2014/01/video-lets-shuck-department-of.html
Race traitors in the pulpits of the nation delivered America into communism. The Stalin-ist model requires complete integration. If we know anything about it – now a century since we were sold into the hands of the Money Power ( the Federal Reserve System 0 – we know communism does not work. This case is the beginning of the end for the CAFOs
The Roman Courts boasted that theyd been in business for 1000 years, thus, there was nothing they hadnt seen. One of their maxims being : the mills of the gods grind slow, but they grind exceeding fine
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sixth Circuit Spoils Milk Processors Win By Reinstating Class Action Alleging Conspiracy To Restrict Milk Supply
The Sixth Circuit recently revived an antitrust class action alleging a conspiracy between a processed milk bottler, a raw milk supplier and a raw milk processor to restrict milk supply in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
Food Lion, LLC v. Dean Foods Co., No. 12-5457 (6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2014) (In re Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litig.).
http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/285250/Antitrust+Competition/Sixth+Circuit+Spoils+Milk+Processors+Win+By+Reinstating+Class+Action+Alleging+Conspiracy+To+Restrict+Milk+Supply
Black Wall Street: The True Story
http://www.blackwallstreet.freeservers.com/The%20Story.htm
hawks nest tunnel disaster, worst industrial disaster in U.S. history
The dead workers were stacked in rows and strapped on the back of the flatbed truck. More of the dead black workers were put in an upright sitting position as if they were alive for their ride to their final resting place. For years rumors spread about workers buried in mass graves on the Martha White farm, but White family members deny this accusation.
http://www.dailyyonder.com/worst-industrial-disaster-our-history/2009/09/15/2346
Black dairy farmer Harry Lewis from Sulphur Springs, Texas, shut down his dairy operation three years ago due to a spike in the cost of cow feed after over 50 years of operation.
http://iamnotarapperispit.com/2010/12/27/17279/
Raw Milk Interview – Dr Abdul Muhammad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbEF42ogYek
National Geographic Live! : Dinka: Legendary Cattle-Keepers of Sudan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erNAdYoqaFo
No matter. I STILL wouldn’t buy Cheerios at gunpoint.
http://naturalsociety.com/gmo-free-cheerios-well-played-marketing-general-mills/