It's Been a Long Wait--Alvin Schlangen Basks in the Limelight, and Looks to Leverage His Success for Others
When I spoke with Alvin Schlangen a few days ago, I asked him how he felt about having been in the shadows of the food rights movement the last couple of years, prior to his trial.
Yes, there had been a demonstration on his behalf last May, but the lion's share of the attention from the media and from people like me who follow the expanding food rights movement had gone to people like Daniel Allgyer, the Pennsylvania Amish farmer who served a Maryland food club, James Stewart and Sharon Palmer in California of Rawesome Food Club fame, and Michael Schmidt, the Canadian raw dairy farmer under on-again-off-again legal pressure from the Ontario government.
During the last two-and-a-half years, Schlangen had endured multiple searches of his farm, van and warehouse from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, the theft of thousands of dollars of members' food, and misdemeanor charges in two counties that could have landed him in jail for two years or more.
No, he told me, by no means did he feel neglected. "I always thought attention should go to the immediate problem." And that has shifted. "My longtime objective was not to focus on the fact that we were held up, but to maintain what we had and to stay positive."
Of course, Schlangen became the immediate problem a couple weeks back, and the inspiring solution when a jury acquitted him of all charges. What has occurred since he was acquitted has astounded him--it's much more than he ever could have imagined.
He's been granted free admission to the Weston A. Price Foundation's Wise Traditions Annual Conference in Santa Clara in early November. He plans to attend in what will be his first trip ever to California.
He has people clamoring to join his food club, the one the Minnesota Department of Agriculture worked so hard to destroy. He figures he'll be up from 140 to 200 members by the end of October, and possibly 400 members by the end of this year.
And he has taken the offensive on his remaining legal problems. Though he was acquitted in Hennepin County in Minneapolis, he still faces similar misdemeanor charges in his home of Stearns County. His lawyer, Nathan Hansen, is planning to seek dismissal of the Stearns County charges based on something known as "serialized prosecution," which he terms "a cousin of double jeopardy." In other words, a new trial on the same charges could be akin to trying Schlangen twice for the same crimes, which is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution. A pretrial hearing is scheduled for Nov. 2 to hear the case.
Once he put these immediate legal issue behind him, Schlangen wants to pursue recovering thousands of dollars of financial damages from the MDA, and getting those officials responsible for his nightmare of the last two-and-a-half years fired.
And he wants to devote as much energy as he can to spreading the word about food rights, and helping other farmers and food clubs under assault.
"I just turned 55 this week and have never felt more ALIVE!" he says. "Thank you all for that," he says to those who supported him through his dark times. To be able to feel so alive again is, after all, quite the gift.
This site's mission is to provide news and analysis about food rights and raw milk. Increasingly, our access to privately available food is under attack by government and industry forces that seek to impose their choices on us. The Complete Patient seeks to provide up-to-date information and encourage the development of community to maintain traditional food acquisition options.
http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/11-000-german-schoolchildren-probably-... <~~~American media story
Guess who the subcontractor was....
http://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-strawberries-sicken-11200-german-...
China........surprise surprise
I hope and pray that Mr. Schlangen sues the pants off the state and all who have been involved in his harassment and money loss.
@ Sylvia: I never know for sure how to feel about the business of suing the pants off someone, especially when that someone involves the gubment. Sometimes (I won't say always) it has a way of turning on a person. If Alvin sues and wins the gubment will be a forever fixture wherever he is, you can almost count on it. If he does nothing, people say oh he's namby pamby and didn't do anything to fight the beast while he could have.
I don't know. I'm like you about the money part though - the gubment should have to reimburse and the judge should have specified exactly what that involves.
If he does nothing, is he sending a message that there will be no reprisals when harassed?
If he files harassment charges (for various reasons) will that send a message that harassment will not be tolerated? By filing charges for harassment et al, he is also moving closer to getting laws changed, it will open more eyes to the happenings to the farmers and products. A slow process for sure, but a step forward.
It looks like he's already on the government's s--t list. I'm not sure how it can get worse.
Meanwhile, we know for a fact that collaborating in keeping things quiet never helps one and only makes it easier for the enemy, and that those who fight back do better than those who don't.
I hope that our resident McCarthyite racist, Gordon Watson, has paid attention to the recent discussion about the destruction of an indigenous Scandinavian culture.
This wasn't the work of the dread "socialists", Watson. This was the industrial revolution at work.
Many thanks to Greenpeace and the UN for this documentary. I certainly have some critical disagreements with both organizations. My disagreements are far different than the right-wingers who frequently comment here.
Thanks again, TommCulhane.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKLgP8tnyGo
Your welcome Bill. Btw is wasn't the UN that made the documentary, is was made for the UN by the Saami Council, a group trying to save the Saami people's last forests. (did you catch how the head of that lumber company was appointed by the UN to oversee natural areas? Nice. The UN, another horse you don't want to bet on.) Not sure why you don't like Greenpeace, send me an email if it's anything big I need to know, Green peace guys risked prison and chainsaw attacks and more to help document that film...
Tomm,
I respect a lot of the work that Greenpeace does. My only contention with them is their opposition to the work that Paul Watson and Sea Shepard do.
And I certainly take issue with Watson's misogyny, top-down organizing model, and dismissal of social justice issues as petty human social concerns. But I think it is nonetheless important to support the anti-whaling work he does in the Pacific, with those conditions. When 3 countries have a warrant out for your arrest for radical enviromental activism, you know you are doing something right!
Speaking of the whale family, for people that don't know, bottlenose dolphins have brains 40% larger than ours, I believe it was libertarian economist Murray Rothbard who made the brilliant statement, "We will acknowledge animals having rights when they petition those rights." Murr, check out the research of dr John lilly re interspecies communication with dolphins, and also what native spiritual teachers say that are able to directly communicate with other species, and I think you can consider those rights petitioned.
I guess Rothbard would have to agree that corporations and government agencies have no rights, since never once has one of them petitioned on its own behalf.
Perhaps, then, by Rothbard's logic, Tomm, SLAVES didn't have rights because they could not petition.
Keep in mind, most slaves were intentionally forbidden from learning reading and writing skills.
Rothbard was a horrific reactionary, in my opinion. I have have read him extensively, and can trace many of the features of the modern "libertarian" movement to his theories.
This essay, in particular, explains much of the racism, homophobia, anti-feminist, sex-negative, and paranoid conspiracy theories about the banking system (the Rothschild family, free mason, bildeberg group, etc, etc) which characterize modern "raw milk libertarianism"
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch5.html
I hope Rothbard burns in hell. Even though I am (more or less) an athiest.
Thanks for the research suggestions, btw, Tomm. There is another book you might be interested in called "The Secret Life of Plants."
btw... didn't mean that attack on Rothbard to be an attack on you Tomm!! I definetly appreciate your ecological and progressive approach!
No worries Bill. Secret Life of Plants, yes I read it long ago, and really liked it, and other works by the same author. Now see, I would have thought you'd call that "superstition", as I believe you used that word somewhere in this thread re transmutation? So yes we must be careful not to label and prejudge, as others have pointed out. Re "paranoid conspiracy theories about the banking system", well, if you take out the word "paranoid" and also "theories", yes that would be getting close to my views there. Re "sex negative", yeah I'm definitely not that, I think happiness is a good thing.
hey later in this thread I asked for ideas re remineralization of soil, because you brought up how you can tell from making cheese, when the milk is rich in calcium and when it isn't, and it has to do with soil mineralization you say. I'm curious to hear your views on remineralization, if you haven't posted there already.
Re Murray Rothbard, I feel I should add, the reason I know about him is because 30 years ago I used to call myself a libertarian, graduating from college as a cpa, it made a lot more sense to me than the democrats or the republicans... and then I was a salesman in California, and then went to Brazil and was an english teacher... and when I came back I found an amazing book about a Native healer, and it had this huge overlap with libertarians, but the natives applied the philosophy to all species, not just one... and so I started calling myself a "deep ecological libertarian", ... and I met all these people involved in environmentalism, and they usually called themselves "progressives", and I found that funny because they had so much in common with "libertarians", but libertarians use the word "progressive" as a joke for a stupid person, so I thought, these people need to sit down together and share ideas... and I started to really get drawn to the 60s, this time when people were starting to awaken, and look for new ideas, trying to find the answers, ... I cry when I hear "California Dreaming"... and I really respect seekers, whatever they call themselves, Christian mystics, Earth religion people, ... and now I ride a bicycle and live in a tent city on my land till I get new land or something more permanent built, and now I call myself a homesteader and maybe i'll be a "small farmer" soon, when people ask me "what I do"... and anyway so the moral of the story is labels really don't work for me anymore, everyone's on their unique path. Labels really can get in the way. "Are you a democrat or a repubulican?" No. "Paper or plastic?" No. I'll carry the food myself.
Personally, I don't know much about remineralization of bones and teeth, if that is what you are asking about. I do know that farms which have invested in remineralization of soil have seen the fertility and biological activity of their soil increase dramatically in a relatively short period of time. And from emperical experience as a cheesemaker, I know that milk from those farms usually makes better cheese.
In the upper Midwest, our resident experts on soil mineralization are Midwestern Bio Ag. Sorry I don't have anyone to refer you to in Florida.
http://www.midwesternbioag.com/
re: libertarianism, have you ever studied Murray Bookchin? His theories are, in my opinion, much better than Rothbard's. He was a left-wing libertarian (aka, an Anarchist) with a strong ecological or "Green" bent. He didn't carry all of the right-wing and "free market" baggage that Rothbard did.
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bookchin/BookchinCW.html
hey Bill, yeah I am familiar with him, there's a great indy library in Gainesville if ever you're there, Civic Media Center, anarchist magazines there... hey if ever you're there, check out my dvd I donated to them. It's a comedy, but not exactly , well I had my own nonfiction book ready to go, but it felt too serious to write, Escape From Plantation Earth: How to be Free of the Secret Govt. So I made a comedy movie instead called Jack Auffe Private Eye. 1hr 45min. (nobody bought it when i had the website and trailer on youtube, but hey it's still in that library for free) You sound like you're ready to write your own book or movie yourself. Yeah next time i'm at Civic Media Center I will have to post some raw milk info on the bulletin board (I've already posted info on the Farm to Consumer Defense Fund at the Gainesville Gardeners Coop Meetup group's site). Hey check out the Civic Media Center's website sometime. Love to see your cheese factory someday.
That's a good point :)
Let me try that again, since my little comment ended up somewhere totally unrelated!
Russ, good point about corporations and government agencies having no rights, since they've never petitioned on their own behalf.
http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/ap/problems-found-at-peanut-butter-plant-...
"FDA has found problems at Sunland before. Agency records show two inspections at the plant in 2009 and 2010 found "objectionable conditions" but classified the findings as not meeting the agency's threshold for action. "
Excuse me? What a worthless waste of tax payers money. Definitely not looking out for the people.
see the segment of the tv show "Jeopardy" where Watson-the-Computer beat the very best human contestants. Watson-the-computer being named after my distant relative who started IBM.
Of course I have to cut you some slack in all this, Mister Anderson ... you're too young to know that Sen. Joseph McCarthy's accusations about the upper echelons of the US govt. being infested with card-carrying commies, were borne out : Exhibit One being Alger Hiss, who went to prison. The tragic condition in Ham-merica today, is the inevitable outworking of those poisonous polices, playing out to the bitter end
glad to see you're coming around to what I've been saying for nigh-on a decade : that the Campaign for REAL MILK is indeed a racial phenomenon = white people remembering our heritage, starting with the food laws in the Law of our God
A good day to you Watson. Thank you for demonstrating to us so wonderfully that genes do not dictate intelligence. Your relative may have been an IBM genuis, but you certainly are not.
There's one fundamental problem with your racist theory about the raw milk movement:
WHITE PEOPLE AREN'T THE ONLY ONES WHO TRADITIONALLY RAISE DAIRY ANIMALS.
I could rattle off legnthy descriptions of traditional cheeses made by Chicana (aka "hispanic"), Middle Eastern, and (eastern) Indian cultures, but I'm afraid it would fall on deaf ears in this forum.
So instead, I'm going to let you wallow in your racist ignorance. If you want to learn how to make world-class cheese, you'll have to come to Wisconsin and deal with my socialist ramblings. Socialism is part of my Nordic heritage. The Bible, on the other hand, is a foriegn document from the Middle East. I'll stick to the socialist tomes, thank you.
your personalized attack is pretty far-off the main topic, but it compels me get down to your level . In fact, my IQ was measured at 150 in 1960 when I was selected for the first stage of the Rhodes Scholarship program. I'm the first to admit that that was a long, long time ago.... and it sure ain't that today
my proposition that the Campaign for REAL MILK is white people rejecting the food industry foisted on us by race traitors in high places, is proved every day in the real world, contrasted with that commie pipedream in which you're trapped. Washington State being the handiest example : 27 new raw milk dairies licenced in the last decade, not just incidental to white folks fleeing there from Californication
all-concerned would appreciate it if you'd stay on-topic. People who are busy, feeding the nation with REAL MILK, are not the slightest bit interested in your Marx-ist claptrap, so utterly discredited in every place they've been imposed at gunpoint
I scored in the top 1%, when compared to peers, on every standardized test I've ever taken Watson. But its meaningless. These standardized tests have built-in cultural biases. (Yes, I am saying they are racist). The knowledge required to pass a standardized intelligence test is useless on the production floor of a cheese factory.
I think Einstein said it best (he was a socialist too, by the way)
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Welcome to the real world.
Congrats to Alvin, look forward to shaking your hand in Santa Clara. So proud of you!!
Last evening I spent 2 hours with Dr. Don Huber PhD emeritus from Purdue University. He is the worlds leading researcher and expert on GMO GE foods and round-up ready issues. Boy...did I learn alot.
He spoke only side Jeff Smith and I on a panel that was part of a public viewing of the must see "Genetic Roulette" documentary by Jeff Smith. It is brilliantly done. Filled with experts arround the world. The details and science is amazing.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/10/dr-don-hub...
The one thing that hit me hardest was the extreme antibiotic effect of Round-Up. It is orders of magnitude stronger than pharma based human antibiotics. When Round-Up spray treated foods are eaten....OMG. The effects on GUT flora are massively devasting and worst.
High levels of Round-Up are being found in cord blood of babies birth inside of cities where the mothers have never been on a farm. Levels of Round-Up are being found in urine in the general population that far exceed the levels that have been shown to cause cancer. It is pervasive!!! Everywhere. This is where eating "Organic" really has purpose and serious value.
It was fascinating to see that a retired soils science, ex military bio-terrorism expert PhD from Purdue, a GMO watch dog activist ( Jeff Smith ) and a Organic Raw Milk Dairyman and retired EMS paramedic: all sat on a panel and have everything in common. It is all about the GUT flora and immunity. All of us were connected by the concern for the health of the next generation and how it is being truly destroyed by the greed of Monsanto. Think Autism and GUT conditions???
If I was president for a day....Seal Team Six would be sent to Monsanto Corp offices and every top manager, scientist and CEO etc....would be arrested and sent to GIT MO for special interogations and incarceration. The safety of our nation depends on this!! This would be done to protect America from "Bioterrorism Inflicted" by Monsanto. Seal Team Six next stop would be the FDA and anyone that did not support nutritional prevention through whole food agriculture would be classified as a BIo Terrorist.
All GIT MO bound....
That would send a message to the USDA that is it human need before corporate greed and to stop screwing with nature and life on earth. The facts are all here, the science has been corrupted. The science of corrupting science has been perfected.
When it comes to the destruction of our next generation....this is war and Monsanto and those that stand with them are the truest of American enemies.
I am not sure why the UN has not already declared Monsanto a danger to life on earth. Maybe Monsanto has the UN under a spell as well.
Perhaps my dream of being president for a day is more like dictator for a day...but when it comes to our children, I do not care what anyone said.....This must stop. The congress can then hold hearings and testimonies can begin.
Hearings to include:
Experts from NIH, Human Biogenomics project, GMO experts, Pasteurization experts, raw milk experts, disease analysis regarding the American GUT.
Alass....America would be shaken to its core and American Agriculture could retake its rightful place as a center piece of health. Medical care would shift, soils would matter...and the first steps to sustainablity would begin.
Sounds like radical talk....not so much.
And Mark, don't forget to invite to those "hearings" Dr.'s Vandana Shiva and Shiv Chopra. They could truly enlightened the Washington D.C. "wonks." However, the sad reality is that those "wonks" do know better right now...and choose to do nothing to correct this horrible nutritional trajectory that this beloved nation is traveling. Both presidential candidates eat "clean" non-GMO foods along with their families...but support GMO agriculture! How sinister/obtuse is that?
Americans needn't be afraid of foreign terrorists, because the biggest threat to us is our own gubment and their agencies. Whether it involves food, housing, finances, sustainable agriculture, health industry - and the list goes on - we have only to look at our own kind to see our enemy. Few foreign countries have the actual wherewithall to terrorize the US even if they wanted to, which most do not. They just want the US out of their countries and to leave them alone to make their own decisions. And that's exactly what America should do but we feel the need to be everywhere, as if we have something of value to give. Those countries know we're broke and they're laughing at the irony of it all because we are a stupid country, and no longer a real superpower.
When guys like Bill Gates are funding R&D for vaccination programs that he can't possibly truly understand, as well as siding with and funding monsanto and the like, well, who is going to stop them? Doctors don't vaccinate their own kids, and politicians wouldn't eat food from Safeway - - - not in this lifetime. But the rest of us are supposed to do all of this without a second thought to the consequences. No, we don't have to be afraid of anyone but our own corrupt system.
About a year ago I hosted a Dr. Don Huber seminar at Rutgers University.
The seminar was video recorded is now available for viewing on line:
http://symp.primetechrepair.com/Huber/HerbicideInteractions.htm
Abstract:
Dr. Don Huber
Purdue University
will present a seminar entitled
“Glyphosate and Sustainable Agriculture”
Friday – September 23, 2011
12:30 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Foran Hall Room 138A
Cook Campus
Host: Joseph Heckman, heckman@aesop.rutgers.edu
Light refreshments will be served.
ABSTRACT: Micronutrients are regulators, inhibitors and activators of physiological processes, and plants provide a primary dietary source of these elements for animals and people. Micronutrient deficiency symptoms are often indistinct (“hidden hunger”) and commonly ascribed to other causes such as drought, extreme temperatures, soil pH, etc. The sporadic nature of distinct visual symptoms, except under severe deficiency conditions, has resulted in a reluctance of many producers to remediate micronutrient deficiency. Lost yield, reduced quality, and increased disease are the unfortunate consequences of untreated micronutrient deficiency. The shift to less tillage, herbicide resistant crops and extensive application of glyphosate has significantly changed nutrient availability and plant efficiency for a number of essential plant nutrients. Some of these changes are through direct toxicity of glyphosate while others are more indirect through changes in soil organisms important for nutrient access, availability, or plant uptake. Understanding glyphosate’s mode of action and impact of the RR gene, indicate strategies to offset negative impacts of this monochemical weed management system on plant nutrition and its predisposition to disease. A basic consideration in this regard should be a much more judicious use of glyphosate. Glyphosate damage is often attributed to other causes such as drought, cool soils, deep seeding, high temperatures, crop residues, water fluctuations, etc. Recognizing the common symptoms of drift and residual glyphosate damage to crops and nutrient and disease interactions affected by glyphosate and the RR gene(s) are important in maintaining production efficiency and a sustainable agriculture. Compensation for these effects on nutrition can maintain optimum crop production efficiency, maximize yield, improve disease resistance, increase nutritional value, and insure food and feed safety.
I agree with Bill on this question...no body has the studies to show the Calcium absorption differences between Pasteurized and Raw Milk...but that said, there is a pile of other closely associated data and ionformation.
We all know that Phosphatase enzymes are completely denatured ( by PMO and law ) when milk is effectively pasteurized. We also know that this enzyme is very much essential to the absorption of calcium. There are also other essential elements that are critical to this process and it is not simple...it is very complex and mediated by diseases like osteoporosis.
I cna say with 100% clarity as a matter of official testimonial archive, that consumers of raw milk experience rapid calcium uptake in teeth and bone of their bodies. The evidence of this was submitted during SB 201 hearings in CA in 2008. ( Dean Florez ). Weston A Price has studies from the 1920's shopwing that pasteurized milk is associated with bone loss.
We also know that kids that drink raw milk experience few dental carries when juice drinking and pasteurized milk drinking kids have dental challenges and huge amounts of cavities ( in general ).
Do we really need million dollar studies to validate the truth!!!! Are we that stupid????
Mark
Also, I think that the mineral balance in the animals diet is just as important as raw vs. pasteurized. If the forages are calcium deficient (or deficient in other important minerals), the milk will be too, regardless of weather it is raw or pasteurized.
It is amazing to me, how different the curd feels when making cheese with milk from farms that regularily mineralize their soils vs. those that don't. Joel Salatin doesn't know what he is talking about when he dismisses the importance of soil mineralization. "Biological transmutation" is pretty far-fetched, IMO.
On the topic of Joel Salatin's nonsense, here's one that really got me riled up when I read it. Apparently he has no problem discriminating against women in his apprenticeship program:
http://thebeefjar.com/2011/01/20/why-is-joel-salatin-more-supportive-of-...
Dangerous proposition, to take one blogger's rant and generalize that he discriminates against women.
Same on the soil mineralization. I've been to Joel's farm and heard him talk endlessly about the importance of the soil to all he does. I don't recall him demeaning mineralization, as much as extolling the natural processes that have restored the soil on his farm. He's done pretty well in terms of the food he produces--has a very loyal and growing group of local customers.
When I was at his farm, he was extolling "biological transmutation", which is an unproven hypothesis that nuclear fusion can be conducted within a living cell. I find the idea highly unlikely, personally, although I suppose it isn't outside the realm of possibilities. Certainly, the weight of scientific evidence is against this hypothesis, and I know enough organic dairy farmers who practice intentional soil mineralization (and a few who don't) to know that it makes a difference in pasture fertility, forage quality, and milk quality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_transmutation
Also, more examples of Joel's sexism.
Here he explicitly states his sexist policy towards apprentices. If the other websites are to be believed, this is a positive shift from his previous policy, which didn't allow any females:
http://www.polyfacefarms.com/apprenticeship/
Here he even admits to being sexist:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jan/31/food-industry-environ...
Here's another person complaining about the sexism in his apprenticeship selection:
http://www.sufficientself.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=4351&p=1
And to make matters worse, he is only feeding the Vegan's mistrust of the movement for sustainable animal agriculture with his sexism, as evidenced in this article:
http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/2-JCAS-V...
I'm just saying David... This movement doesn't do itself any favors when it allies itself with these kinds of anti-scientific anti-egalitarian tendancies. There is certainly a place to criticize the focus of scientific research funded by Monsanto et al, but our goal should be to redirect science towards democratic and humanitarian ends, not to throw it out the window altogether in favor of superstition and patriarchal religious fundamentalism.
Sorry, it looks like his official policy has changed since the last time I looked at the website. It now says "choice not based on gender", although from the picture its clear that there is a major gender imbalance. Clearly, Joel is learning that he needs to be more politically correct as his public profile rises.
Bill
I fail to see where biological transmutation is any more far-fetched then panspermia, punctuated equilibrium (cladogenesous) or phyletic gradualism (anagenesis) etc.
Phyletic gradualism is the most credible of all the above hypothesis or theories when addressing small-scale genetic changes. The theory however is full of holes when one attempts to use it to justify large-scale changes in gene frequency.
Ken
A Bill, another day, another violent trashing of anyone who doesn't agree with your views on everything...
Even the people in the above thread point out
1. He is a Christian
2. He has one house for interns, and as a Christian, cannot allow men to co-live with ladies unmarried
3. He may want to avoid issues with working in close proximity to ladies for extended periods of time, as the Bible commands (avoid any appearance of evil).
4. Gasp, maybe it is a request/preference of his wife, and he is honoring it, that wife hating misnogynist libertarian communist!
But of course, super-tolerant Bill, tolerant of everyone except for anyone who don't agree with you, none of this matters... just another day to trash a good person because they are not like you and don't see things like you and wouldn't submit to being governed by you... and anyone who doesn't is a homo-misno-raco-idio whatever...
And gasp, did you ever bother to read any of the FIRST HAND account comments...probably not, just like when Ron Paul helps black people and they speak about it, you ignore it.
Here is one,
***
Unknown to most, Polyface has had a female apprentice. It was several years ago when they were only doing one apprentice at a time (had to be at the beginning). This allowed for women because they only have one cottage (single room cabin type) and housing a man and a woman in the same one room cottage just doesn't work for most of the young men that come, not to mention Joel's faith, which for the record, I share. The doorway to the bathroom is a curtain, so I would be uncomfortable sharing that living quarters with a woman that I'm not married to... not to mention the potential for romance. Two young people... one room... no TV... night comes early in the winter... its cold... you get the picture. I know for a fact that when you put people together that have common dreams, romance blooms.
Joel loves to see women excel. He started accepting women interns for that reason. He has even hired one of these past women interns to run one of his rental farms. Thats right... she runs about 320 acres ALONE... No man in her life and she does GREAT. She ran 20 broiler pens and about 1800 laying hens last season and moved the cow herd when they were on her farm. He also LOVES his wife and daughter. It was very clear he knew that he would be NOTHING without the undying love and support from his wife. She is like a mother to me now and is VERY respected by everyone. I hope to treat my wife as well as Joel treats his.
If you gals have any others questions... ask Joel. If you can't get him, feel free to ask me. I can't speak for him, but I might be able to shed light on something that might seem so dark.
***
I am sure Bill you actually took the time to read the discussion... yep, and probably, talk to female close friend's of Joel, like Liz and others whom he only ever treated with the utmost love and respect. How many did you talk with Bill? Or is this just another "lets plumb the internet for partial evidence to post that agrees with my preconceived opinions of others to seek to tarnish their reputations and make my inconsequential self seem bigger and more important..."
You are a violent guy, Bill, inherently, utterly violent. And a donkey's rear towards many good people, but I am sure Joel, Ron Paul, Max Kane and others are used to it from more than just you. Nonetheless, it is sad to see.
You sure managed to pigeonhole me, John.
Why don't you come make cheese with me sometime? I'd love to talk to you about this stuff in person, rather than over the internet.
I certainly would be the first to admit that even in the secular world of Wisconsin cheese factories, there are some major issues with gender, misogyny, and patriarchy. However, those gender issues originate from modern bourgeois private property, not the more primitive "Judeo-Christian private property" that Joel Salatin espouses.
I don't know about the other females on this forum, but I personally would not want to "bunk" in with other males in a small, closely confined cottage....way too close for comfort considering the various habits of men that most women find somewhat objectionable, if you get my drift (use your imagination here! Lol!)!! No, no, I would rather "bunk" in with other females where we could enjoy a much more comfortable coexistence! Please pass the chocolates, Ladies!
@ Bill Anderson: The mere fact that you read this woman's piece-of-garbage-blog speaks volumes for your choices in people. She actually makes it sound as though something untoward is going on at Joel's farm just because he prefers to train men to farm, rather than women.
So she's a feminist, big deal. I grew up on my family farm and it was hard work to help with chores. Whenever I got the chance to dress up and feel feminine, I took it. I still like to have men open doors for me, is that wrong? I like to have a man help me walk across an icy path or whatever - - - is that wrong? She can act like a man if she prefers, but many of us completely understand why Joel thinks men should be the mainstay of his training/operation. It's usually the men who buy the land and work the land, and the women help. Does this feminist blogger understand that his operation also teaches the business end of running a farm? Women can buy and run farms, I understand that because I have farmland that I rent out myself (inherited), but it's not easy to own AND run a farming operation. I'd bet dollars to donuts she doesn't GET that part of it. She sounds like a complete airhead.
I'd love to see her face to face with Joel on that sexist "intimate" remark she made. =o
Sounds like you have internalized some misogyny there, D. Smith. Don't worry, you're not the only one. Even the most progressive feminist cannot escape the pervasive effects of patriarchal socialization -- the result of over two millenia of violence, misogyny, and patriarchy in our Western Judeo-Christian society.
As a matter of fact, I know quite a few very competent, progressive, and successful business-minded female dairy farmers in Wisconsin. To make it all the better, RawMI's first listed farm is female owned and operated. A victory for a new era of progressive dairy farming! Horrah!
Personally, I think everyone (including men) would be better off if women ran the world and shaped society to feminine ideals instead of masculine ones. There would be virtually no war, starvation, rape, or murder. Quality natural healthcare would be a common right of all, and not a privilege for the well-to-do. Egalitarian cooperation would replace cut-throat competition. Sharing would replace hoarding.
I'm sure there are pleny here who will attack me for saying this. I would expect as such from this movement, with all of its right-wing nonsense. Its OK. I can handle the heat. I have plenty of times before.
@ Bill Anderson: I didn't say I wouldn't like for women to "run the world". But that isn't the way things are, women are considered helpmates. All those things you stated about women working dairy farms, etc., do they do that all alone? Do they have help from other women or men?
And, BTW, for your information I'm not a right winger so please stop with the labeling, ok? It's purile.
And yeah, you'll get heat for your post, but probably not this one - you SHOULD get more heat from others here about the post to which I commented. That women is so out of line her blog reeks of ignorance.
You think I mistrust other women? You DO love labels, don't you? Think what you want, you're young and have 40 miles of bad road to go.
Really, D. Smith? I thought that Joel Salatin was the one who is out of line for discriminating against women. I suppose he should consider himself lucky if he hasn't been sued for that yet, seeing as it is blatantly illegal, not to mention unethical. (his screeds against the other "illegal" things he wants to do notwithstanding)
As for the "right-wing" label, our conception of right and left in American is very skewed. And yes, I do think that most of the people who post here are right-wing to one degree or another (with a few notable exceptions, such as Tomm Culhane and Russ).
For example, from a complete historical and global persepctive, Barak Obama is right-wing because of his embrace of neo-liberal free-market economic policies and neo-conservative military policies. Yet the American corporate media erroneously consider him left, because of some quasi-populist rhetoric he spews, which has little to do with his actual policy. See below link:
http://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2012
Or take the term "libertarian", which in America means an adherent of right-wing free market dogmas who also embraces some modestly liberal social policies. In the rest of the world, a "libertarian" is a left-wing Anarchist, who rejects both private property and the state, and seeks to replace them with freely associated democratically controlled worker collectives.
I'm sorry, Bill, but I do have to chime in here....Mr. Salatin has never, ever discriminated against any female who has ever signed up for a place on his apprenticeship program. To take what he has said totally out of context, then apply it to something completely different from what he is saying is a bit deceitful. I have nothing but the deepest respect for him & for what he has accomplished. I have had some of the most insightful, intelligent & awe-ispiring conversations with this incredible human being. The time, effort, diligence & dedication that he has given to the cause of non-industrial food production cannot be commended enough. He has given such an incredible gift to so many others which allowed them to achieve the same on their own farms. He has shown that a farmer does not have to resort to using the conventional methods that only produce unhealthy crops and/or animals. He has been successful in his practices & willing shares the information on how he did it with those who want to do the same. I just don't understand people who are so quick to criticize or belittle someone that they really do not know personally & who has given so much to many, a person that is highly respected & regarded, and that has a huge, loyal, supportive following.
Perhaps, Deborah, you can explain to me why Joel continually suggests that food movement ought to try to emmulate the NRA? He has made this comment in public numerous times, including the one time I met him earlier this year.
Last time I checked, the NRA was full of all of the issues I've discussed before -- misogyny, racism, classism, nationalism.
Personally, I think a better model for FTCLDF might be the ACLU or NLG (national lawyers guild). But even there, I have a few disagreements. Certainly less than with the NRA.
I'm curious where the NRA was when Ronald Reagan was disarming the Black Panthers in the 1970s? Its funny that is one time when the NRA argued FOR gun control, because it meant taking guns out of the hands of black folks who had very little private property.
It seems to me that the NRA cares only about is gun rights for white privileged property-owning males.
If that is going to be the approach of the food rights movement, as Joel want it to be, then you can count me out of this food movement. Joel Salatin is part of the problem. I certainly agree that his approach to farming is innovative and ecological, but his approach to society and politics is thoroughly reactionary and authoritarian, as far as I can tell. Perhaps I could be proven wrong.
Again, I'd invite anyone who disagrees with me to come make cheese in Wisconsin with me. We'll talk about this in person, and get to know each other better.
If you ever heard Joel discuss his admiration of the NRA, it is in terms of the organization's ability to lobby and influence this country's political dynamic. He'd like to see the food rights movement learn from the NRA in that sense. In his discussions of NRA, I don't believe I've ever heard Joel say anything about its actual views. Because that's not the point. He understands that wise people can learn from competing businesses, political movements, and accomplished individuals.
Your obsessive need to categorize everyone and everything according to political ideology is tiresome.
Dang, David, you do need a like button!
Touche, David.
Perhaps, then, we ought to learn from the defense and weapons manufacturing industry. They are, after all, the most successful political lobby in the US, hands down. Far moreso than the NRA, I'd say.
This isn't an obsessive need to categorize everything according to political ideology, on my part. This is a desire to have a social movement which isn't seeking to turn back the clock on things like civil rights and democratic social forms of organization.
As far as I can tell, Joel and many of the other raw milk libertarians have precisely that as their underlying agenda -- turning back the clock on civil rights and democracy.
There are better ways to ensure food rights, like, for example, that old Judeo-Christian institution called the Law of Jubilee, where every 50 years all debts were forgiven and the land redistributed. (Today "debt forgiveness" would take the form of releasing our vast prison population).
In fact, come to think of it, land redistribution would be far more effective at ensuring food rights than any of this unregulated farm-to-consumer silliness. If everyone who wanted 40 acres and cow had it, why would they need to pay someone else to milk the cow for them?
The weapons rackets, like those in every other sector, get their revenues from the top down in the form of corporate welfare, and all their support comes directly from the government. The NRA is primarily a grassroots-supported organization which actually fights. That's why it's an apropos model, and the rackets are not. (As for gun control itself, its class nature is clear. Gun control by definition means gun control for everyone but the 1%.)
In Salatin's latest book he extensively discusses the land distribution and his ambivalence about "property" in land. He even has a nuanced discussion of the PEC, an organization he previously condemned. You can say he's cynically getting more "politically correct" about things, but I think the evidence of the book is that he's learned lots of new things as his ideas met new challenges.
But most of all, the basic fact is that Salatin is the most eloquent and forceful voice for the need to restore pastoralism. It's peevish to go looking for ways to nitpick him, especially given the fact that your go-to link was to a blogger who supports GMOs, CAFOs, and industrial ag in general. (I probably could have found anti-milk stuff there too if I'd looked for it.) If Salatin's really that rabid a sexist, wouldn't there be women from the real farming movement saying so?
BTW, that Salatin land discussion is far more than you'll get in books by liberals like Pollan or Astyk, who won't touch the subject with a ten foot pole.
Are you for real?!! I contradict (from personal knowledge) your accusation of Mr. Salatin discriminating against women & now you bring in the NRA??!! Seriously?!! How did the NRA get into this?!! I don't recall bringing it up, so why would you ask me that?!! You were the one accusing him of gender discrimination & I responded that that accusation is without merit & now you want to change the subject. Unbelievable!!!
That is easy, Deb. It is what Bill does to all who don't agree with him and yet have a high profile. He doesn't care about facts, about the character assessment of people who actually know the person, etc.
Bill is right. All others must bow! I need to get away from this blog. Rarely has anything I read made me as angry as what I have seen tonight. Libel, slander, and stupidity, all in one tidy package.
Joel is a gem, a man who loves others, loves his wife and kids, loves his land and animals, and has done untold good for millions of people. I have met him personally many times now, and to see some upstart ramshackle kid who loves to trash people (Max Kane, Ron Paul, etc.) just riled me up a bit.
Facts, John. You still try to side-step the issue of Ron Paul's racist newsletter.
It is a fact that those racist comments were published under Ron Paul's name in the 1990s. And Paul continues to pander to nativist/anti-immigrant sentiment in recent years.
Do I need to dig up this information again? Or are you going to keep accusing me of libel, when it is in fact yourself who is libelling?
No worries, John. At least you & I know the real Joel, have had the pleasure of his company obviously on more than a couple of occasions. What a shame that someone has to trash him, yet doesn't know a thing about him, nor had experienced any real personal exchange with him. Obviously, it must be very easy for people like Bill to do this, very, very sad!
@ Bill Anderson: Well, I'm not Joel Salatin and therefore cannot speak for him, but have you ever read the blog by his daughter-in-law? Try that.
And truly, Bill, I'm not real interested in your political views or how you want to twist things to fit your own imagination. You can hold your rah rah meetings somewhere else. I'm just sick of you putting people into boxes and you don't know Jack Schitt about them. You know the old saying - you keep lying about me and I'm gonna start telling the truth about you. Then again, you've never charged anything for your preaching - and it was worth it, too.
@ Bill Anderson: When you read something, do you read between the lines so that you're only getting half the story, or maybe only seeing the parts you want to see? That may explain why you don't seem to understand people like Joel Salatin and Ron Paul. You have no clue, because if you'd actually taken the time to do more than just surface read, you wouldn't be making some of those asinine comments.
How about we try to run the world together? I think there's a reason we have 2 sexes. It would be just as bad for women to run the world at the expense of men as the opposite, don't you think? You might have gathered from my user name that I'm a female, and as an acquaintance once said "I'm know I'm not perfect, I just think I am".
Salatin isn't perfect either. There are several things with which I disagree in his latest book, but he's certainly doing a great job of engaging interest in important matters and he appears to be extremely knowledgeable and thoughtful, as well as highly-experienced in his field(no pun intended).
A columnist I enjoy reading once described the male-female roles as "complementary", neither one inferior nor superior.
I didn't realize you were young, Bill. You sound kinda like a grumpy old man :)
We don't all agree on everything Joel Salatin or Wendell Berry or any of those guys say, but it doesn't mean any of them are wrong - or right. It just means we all think differently and that's ok.
But the people making the laws we're supposed to be following think very differently than you and I and Joe Blow because they're being paid to think whatever it is they think - by corporate lobbyists. It doesn't mean the corporate world is right, however, and I just happen to think Joel and Wendell are a whole lot closer to the real truth than our gubment will ever be, don't you? The scary part is that the gubment is in control of the whole shebang. It doesn't make me feel better to know that.
I have a question about soil mineralization for Bill, Gordon, JohnM, David, Ken, Mark and or anyone else. What a robust conversation btw. And thanks David for setting up this fine blog. I discovered it just a short time ago, and hopefully will be getting back to my land soon, where I don't have internet, except when I ride into town, so I thought I'd milk this forum (no pun) for some info. Well it seems you folks know a lot about farming and have real world experience, I grew up in a city so my development has been retarded you could say. Anyway six years ago I bought 5 acres. I'm trying to sell it to get something closer to town, I live in north florida, zone 8 I guess you call it. My heads kind of spinning with all these new ideas I have encountered and come up with, reading goat forums, "permaculture" (I hate new buzzwords but have found some knowledgable people there), I've been looking for the best tasting foods in heirloom seed forums like seedsavers.org, I only first heard of Joel Salatin like 2 months ago when a friend sent me a vid, I found that japanese no till farmer's ideas recently to, the one straw revolution guy, "do nothing farming", which instantly resonated with me, as did Salatin's ideas as I understood them...
Anyway like I say my head's kind of spinning with all this. So as far as regularly mineralizing the soil, vs well, my take on things is to let your land self mineralize, as was done by nature, if this is possible, so I'm interested to hear different views here, if anyone wants to jump in? In laymen's terms, so what is meant by remineralizing, because i'm sure you don't mean using big ag type chemicals?
I'm interested in that too. It's too bad the conversation went off on a tangent because I was more interested in the "biological transmutation" subject. I once read something Salatin said in an interview with Chris Martenson which struck me as odd - that earthworms create elements or something. I figured that's what was being referred to here.
John and I cross posted---and I agree with him. My comments are in regard to our larger acreage.
I'd like to add that trying to restore 50 acres is daunting....I am overwhelmed and depressed to even consider the millions of acres of cropland in the US that is only productive because of total fertilizer supplements--the soil is a dead substrate for plant roots. No added fertilizers--no plant growth.....no soil ecology...
Ron
Ron,
I would suggest more acres would be EASIER, to a certain point in many parts of the coutry... I think I would have a far easier time restoring a 500 acre than my 50 acre farm, because of the ability to mob-stock ruminants, more efficient/affordable use of infrastructure, etc. As Joel once said, "it takes just as much time to open a gate or move a fence for 10 cows as 200..." There was a great discussion on the ethicurean a few years ago about what constituted small farm, scales of production, etc. But in general, most small farms are too small to reach a reasonable economy of scale to offer good pricing AND good care of their land- scale and increase in size is what is needed.
Obviously, super farms are a different matter... but small farms traditionally were several hundred acres, and that moderate size has some big advantages in terms of stewardship and ease of care IMO and experience.
Disagree, John. If you do intensive permaculture plantings, a modest acreage can suffice, although it will be mostly for survival and some very local markets, not for commercial purposes.
As a professional cheese maker, I certainly appreciate the value of a medium-sized commercial organic dairy farm. But I think in the long term, even those commercial farms need to be turned into silvo-pastures, and turned into cooperative enterprises farmed by several different specialists (the dairy farm being only one component).
This, btw, segues into another thing Joel Salatin got wrong when I heard him speak. It is not grass which sequesters the most atmospheric carbon. It is SAVANNA ECO-SYSTEMS which sequester the most carbon.
My suggestions, for your acreage, would be to get Harvey Ussery's book "Backyard Poultry Flock," if you plan to have chickens or fowl, etc. and find a good place in state to do soil testing. He has an excellent discussion inside what is an amazingly thorough and enjoyable book, and reminds us that any piece of land has multiple inhabitants and all give and take to the health and balance of the soil. Managing all those parts is art, and why real farmers are so valuable.
Basically, if I am understanding your question correctly, soil re mineralization is the principle of putting back into the soil 1. what has been lost through improper or proper farming over time (even proper farming is like writing checks against a bank account, and deposits must from time to time be made). 2. Ensuring those things are in BALANCE and BIOAVAILABLE. You can have lots of minerals in the soil, but if your pH is off, certain microbes are lacking, they are in the wrong forms, etc. plants will not be able to utilize them.
Yes, we are looking for natural forms/types of minerals, when possible naturally derived/redirected, though the organic/sustainable movement, sadly, is heavily dependent on getting mineral from far away places (ocean and mountains), just like the conventional. If you go to an ACRES or similar publication, conference, you will get to see all the major current vendors of mineral products and what is available.
For me, my main mineral program is pretty simple. I feed my chickens extremely well, with an organic non-GMO feed ration with added mineral of both oyster shell and a nutri-balancer (whose bedding goes onto the garden in the Fall, which I let them till in), and thus get a high N, P, K along with lots of trace minerals fertilizer. I mulch my garden heavily with wood chips/leaves, both to suppress weeds and to feed soil fungi and microbes and to build soil matter. I never leave any bare soil anywhere in my garden, and next year plan to use cover crops coupled with heavy mulching. Not only does it save me countless hours weeding, it also conserves insane amounts of water in the soil... we are taking 50-80% reduction in watering needs, even with the insane drought we had this Summer.
There is a great video free online called Back to Eden you can check out to see the principles in action.
I also make my own worm castings and soil amendments to plant right around the things I plant, and use very limitedly fish emulsion. Our soil was TERRIBLE when we moved here - we are talking organic matter % below .5%. We basically had grass growing on clay.
I plan to start incorporating cover cropping soon to help deepen my soil and drive good stuff farther down and all the other benefits that cover cropping creates. Like you, I am a city boy, but with a bit more farm experience over the past few years but not much; yesterday we celebrated two years on our farm. If you check out my facebook page (http://tinyurl.com/9bapkax), I am going to post pictures of the difference you can make in two years to soil health and productivity. You may have to friend me, scary thought, to see them. I may not to get them posted for a few days, as we have a work crew coming today.
Generally as well, we care more than about just mineral balance and content, but organic matter composition and content, biological activity (microbes, fungi, etc.), and other things that all go into creating a robust and resistant soil ecology.
Soil management to some extent requires some testing, as normally with the plants by the time they tell you you have an issue you are going to lose plants/production/have pests and other problems because of it, but you won't know till it is late in the game.
Depending on what your land is currently like where you grow crops, a method I have been very happy with is a modified "Lasagna" gardening method, mainly using wood chips to bury the grass under 24-30 inches of wood chips, with a bottom layer of double/low/no ink cardboard to kill/suppress grass/weeds.
You can write a few books on this topic... heck, you could fill a library at this point, I am sure some people have whole libraries filled with it! Also, with this issue, there is a big bit of FWIW (For what its worth); what works for some amazingly I have seen epic fail for others, and vice versa. Some principles cross all methods, but some will surprise you, and then, like WAPF's research, what we are really looking for is how does it stand up to the LONG TERM, not just a few years or even a decade.
I also find some of the ideas you mentioned intriguing, but have no experience with them yet. We have enough space that I plan to try a few of them next year.
The first step is to have your soil tested for macro and micro nutrients. The second step is to have a clear picture of what you intend to do specific to the nature and character of your land. The do nothing farming ideas ("One Straw Revolution") are long term investments in producing a living soil, and do not presuppose total self mineralization since soil does not self mineralize. Your soil tests will tell you if you need to supplement. Supplementing is done with the end goal of promoting healthy soil ecology and biota-which is the basis for sustainable agricultural practices. Mineral supplementing is not the same as big ag type chemicals, and mined mineral can be obtained from ag suppliers. This is what we are doing-since most of our former topsoil is in a 15-20' layer at the base of our fields-where it cannot even be mined-a heart breaking testament to 150 years of abusive agricultural practices. To date, minus equiment rental, labor , seed, mental health support, and fuel costs, restoration of our farm is averaging $340/acre in off site purchased mineral supplements. (We cannot generate enough manure and "waste dairy" to restore the land-we can generate enough to sustain and promote healthy soil once we restore soil ecology-I have our manure tested.)
To restore farmland you need to think deeply, converse with your land and engage. (For smaller garden acreage I'd suggest looking at Steve Solomon's fertilizer formulations in his book Gardening When it Counts as an entry to thinking about this stuff.)
Dr. Heckman perhaps can comment and recommend a few good references on soil restoration-I need to have a decent soil science reference text.
Thanks,
Ron
Good thoughts Ron. One thing I would add for larger acres, there are other input streams to be had that are generally still neglected that Harvey discusses in his various articles.
I am able to get wood chips/mulch by the truck load from the local power company, coffee grounds by hundreds of lbs from local coffee shops, pitch organic produce and food scraps, slab wood (outer trimmings from a neighbor's saw mill) for mixing into compost piles and allowing to rot in a pig wood lot area, etc. If only I had a team of horses, tractor, or bobcat...:) My main limitation isn't the available compostable streams, but the equipment to handle it.
You can often get manure, decent quality, for little to free as well depending on where you are and what you are looking for.
All of this allows me to rebuild soil for a fraction of the cost of doing it all with stuff brought and bought from farther away.
Look forward to other comments.
John M is right on with this. Soil will regenerate itself if given the chance, and covering the soil in the same way that Nature does is how we help make it happen. Please watch the film Back To Eden for an introduction. (It features a west-coast Christian evangelical. If that puts you off, you will miss an absolute gem of biological instruction.) You will learn how proper mulching and avoiding tilling will transform a garden.
The advantages of allowing Nature to develop life in the first inches of soil are immense. I speak from experience here. Living, dynamic soil tends to balance all things, including pH, making supplementation beyond good quality surface mulch unnecessary. It was amazing to me to find that acid-loving and alkaline-loving plants can coexist in the same soil. It works only when there is an abundance of natural microbial and fungal life, which in turn helps the nematodes and the worms, helps manage soil particle size, water balance, oxygen balance, everything.
Eating from vigorous soil is simply the most important thing we do biologically to improve our health. Not incidentally, proper gardening is inexpensive, less fuel-dependent than monoculture, and requires much less land per nutritive unit.
Likewise, eating from depleted soils is an easy way to become unhealthy, weak, overweight, and poor.
Sounds a lot like the youtube video called 12 Aprils which I've posted here before. No till farming, using the manure from your own cattle to build up soil. Doesn't happen overnight though. Nothing good ever does.
Similar Dave, and definitely not overnight, but I think soil restoration can be done far faster than most realize... for instance, I have been able to build up to 12 inches of good quality growing soil in under 12 months in many places on my farm, for very low cost. I started with rock hard, no organic matter clay, one of the worst possible starting points. Still have a long way to go, but in 2 years, you can substantially restore a few acres of land with an ease that would surprise most people if you have access to the right inputs, most of which are locally available.
Dave - you are so spot on "eating from depleted soils is an easy way to become unhealthy, weak, overweight, and poor." Many farmers such as Joel Salatin & Will Allen, just to name a few, have stated this over & over. Yes, it is a big & laborious job to bring back healthy soil, but it is doable & so, so badly needed. So far, no one has mentioned worms! I remember as a kid growing up on our family farms in Wisconsin, my uncles were very big on 'growing' worms (& I mean on a very large scale!!), they insisted that worms needed to be added to the fields (they also were very dedicated to crops & field rotation) in order to provide the needed nutrients to the soil in order to produce healthy crops. I remember my uncles collecting lots of doors from the dumps, neighbors who were renovating, etc & they used these doors as their worm farms. They added deep sides to the doors, placed them on saw-horses, added the soil, compost, used butcher-paper & then 'grew' the worms in these. There were so many of them & as each one yielded up thousand of worms, they would transfer them to the fields & then start the process all over. They were very adamant that this was the key to keeping their fields healthy. I know this is the way that Will Allen reclaimed the acreages for crop production in Milwaukee & he gives seminars on how this can be done. It is very easy to do & would be a great way to add to the steps in reclaiming damaged soil.
Ron, I'm glad you mentioned Solomon's book, because that's testimony that I'm on the right track. I have access to about a quarter-acre of land which hasn't been worked in many years and has gone to "weeds". A creek runs through the middle of it. The soil's probably pretty good (I grew sweet corn, edamame, and squash on a small portion of it this year). I was planning to work a larger portion this year, using Solomon as my guide as much as possible.
That is, a larger portion this coming year, 2013.
The organic fertilizer formula in his book worked very well for us on our last farm as did many of his other recommendations. We were on a glacial moraine- great drainage due to 60 feet of 22A class road gravel for soil. It took several years to build a base of 18 inches of rich top soil.
Thanks JohnM and everyone who's posting here. (it's too much for me to read all at once, will reread in depth) When I bought my land, people told me I need to get the soil tested and add lime and whatnot to change the ph... but it didn't feel right to me. So I just started farming anyway (I'm kind of lazy) ... and have had some success with watermelons and potatoes... anyways so recently I found this "natural farming" video on you tube, and that's where I heard of the "do nothing" "no till" approach, ... and I see people here talking about the idea of the soil ph taking care of itself, it you use heavy mulch... and well stuff like that really appeals to me, creating the soil from the top down... Again. like I say I'm lazy. I have lots of pine needles on my land, as I preserve most as woods, and I thought that might make great mulch, but some people say it's too acidic... so anyways I find this guy in a forum saying it works great, his soil went from acidic to neutral over time with the pine needles...
"you may have to friend me (scary thought), to see them..." Hey JohnM if that was directed to me, no worries. I don't use facebook though, but hey, anyone that calls themself a christian and could read my very politically incorrect posts in the fda arms buildup thread, and still answer my question here (and in so much depth), hey you must be a very tolerant person. Peace and Love, Tom
Re soil self mineralizing or not, it does seem to me that it must, over time, I mean look at a rainforest and how rich it is, and isn't this how the "bank account" of soil was created? I see what people mean though, why they say organic farming isn't sustainable, because if you are selling food, nutrients are leaving your farm. And when John q public eats the apple you grew for him, the core usually ends up in a landfill, and the humanure from it ends up in rivers, lakes, oceans, setpic tanks, instead of back in the soil where it belongs. Can enough nutrients be created on your land so that you don't need to bring extra in from outside sources? If people had their own land and farmed for themselves, seems that would be no problem. But if you're selling food, well I got the impression from that natural farming video I watched that they think enough nutrients can be created where you don't need outside fertilizers. i may be wrong. Speaking of sources for organic matter for you garden, where I am at as I type this, now that all the leaves are falling, people put this "yard waste" from their lawns into big paper bags to be picked up by garbage trucks once a week, don't know where they haul it, but you could have tons of these leaves if you wanted to bring nutrients back to your land.
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/chinasSoilRuined.php
Cropland soils are turning acid from the overuse of nitrogen fertilizers, decreasing productivity, polluting the environment, and contributing huge amounts of greenhouse gas emissions; researchers recommend reducing fertilizer use, but have not considered phasing it out altogether by adopting organic agriculture Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
Those who use chemical fertilizers treat the soil as if it were a hydroponic medium and are in essence mining rather then nurturing the soil. Soil is a complex self-regulating organic structure that demands our respect and if nurtured properly will self-mineralize and achieve the appropriate balance to produce healthy food.
Lowering or raising soil pH can be a slow and challenging process. The nature of the soil substrate or underlying bedrock has a substantial influence on soil pH. Soils layered over limestone bedrock for example, are strongly buffered by inorganic ions through the weathering of soil minerals derived from that substrate and tend to be more alkaline then those layered above crystalline, acidic, bedrock, as is the case in the region where I live.
Acid soils also occur most frequently in higher precipitation areas and especially in areas where coniferous tree cover was and continues to be the dominant type of vegetation.
Adding pine needles to the soil will lower the pH thus increasing soil acidity.
Ken
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Why_Glyphosate_Should_be_Banned.php
“Soil biology is strongly disrupted by glyphosate, which is toxic to many beneficial micro- and macro-organisms including earthworms. It harms a wide range of microbes, those producing indole-acetic acid (a growth-promoting auxin), responsible for mycorrhizae associations, phosphorus & zinc uptake; microbes such as Pseudomonads and Bacillus that convert insoluble soil oxides to plant-available forms of manganese and iron; nitrogen-fixing bacteria Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium; and other organisms involved in the biological control of soil-borne diseases.”
"In addition to soil microorganisms, Roundup® but not glyphosate alone, kills three beneficial food microrganisms (Geotrichum candidum, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus) widely used as starter cultures in the dairy industry [89]. This may explain the loss of microbiodiversity in raw milk observed in recent years."
Ken
" rapid calcium uptake in teeth and bone of their bodies. "
calcium requires other co-factors for absorption, otherwise, it is just excreted or deposited in unwanted tissues. If you don't have adequate Vit D,K,C,E,Bs, and other nutrients, along with some sort of weight bearing activities, you will have receding gums, poor bone regeneration, and a slew of other health issues.
My kids grew up on boiled milk, neither have ever had any cavities and they are in their 30s now.
I suspect your kids ate little refined sugar? Refined sugars are the fastest way to strip calcium out of the body (I believe it's because the trace minerals found in whole sugar are necessary for the sugar to "burn" right in the body- I eat all the whole sugar I want. Price would disagree with this, as would many people. But I have found evidence supporting it, people working in sugar cane fields eating the cane raw every day, and having no cavities and no diabetes. But I can't say I've definitely confirmed this, but it is what I would predict.) The superfood raw milk is the fastest way to put it back in. Here's a study dealing with kids that probably didn't eat as well as yours did:
"Dr. Evelyn Sprawson of the London Hospital has recently stated that in certain institutions children who were brought up on raw milk (as opposed to pasteurized milk) had perfect teeth and no decay. Whether this was due actually to the milk being unheated, or possibly to some other, quite different and so far unrecognized cause, we cannot yet say; but we may be sure of one thing, that the result is so striking and unusual that it will undoubtedly be made the subject of further inquiry."
—Harris, L.J., Vitamins in Theory and Practice, page 224, Cambridge, University Press, 1935.
I'm still waiting for the establishment to do that further inquiry. Wonder if it'll make the front page. Not.
I cannot dispute that a healthy diet improves and/or maintains a healthy body. My kids did have refined sugar, I used to do a lot of baking, we also lived in Germany next to a bakery when they were young. They did not get grocery store sweets often, especially at home. They were close to 10 yrs old before they tasted coke. I also pushed for good oral hygiene from the time they were toddlers and never had any problems with brushing teeth or bathing (had to fight them to get out of the tub). Along with nutrition, lifestyle has a big influence on our bodies.
The "studies" done in, I think it was the 40s, in regards to fluoride added to tap water and supposedly decreasing cavities...was debunked. The showed that parents may have influenced the children to better care for their teeth (They were told they were in a study regarding cavities), thus the parents 'may' have pushed for more and better brushing.
With the amount of cavities here in America in children's mouths, I would question not only their diets, but also what they do for oral hygiene. I have a feeling that many if not most, really don't brush daily.
Anything else you did that you think helped, I'm all ears, because two people in their 30s with no cavities is pretty awesome today.
My daughter is in her thirties and she has no cavities. She is a disabled person, uses a wheelchair for mobility and her disability is spastic quadriplegic. It IS the raw milk & whole foods diet minus refined & processed grain/sugars! Amen.
User2690, Kudos to you and your daughter. Life is difficult enough without added challenges. I hope she continues in good health.
Tom, I can't think of anything else. Just daily tooth brushing and when young they didn't have much processed foods. I was a very young mom, and didn't know about all the supposed' ways to raise your kids", I would explain to my kids why things were done and what consequences may happen when things are mistreated/neglected. I was a stay-at-home mom till they started school and started working nights after that. My husband was enlisted in the army so our income was very limited. Home made was cheaper than store bought and I could make it stretch further than processed junk. we utilized you-pick-it farms and grew what we could on our patios. I think my kids started eating junk in their teen years, they bought it with money they earned. I think it was somewhere in their 20s they got tired of the junk and started cooking real food for themselves. Neither has a sweet tooth now.
I think when you explain reasoning behind things, people are more apt to do what is needed. Like post surgical patients, there is a device used to help fully inflate the lungs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incentive_spirometer It is wonderful for helping to prevent post-op pneumonia. People with incisions, especially belly incisions, don't want to do it,it can hurt like hell, but usually after explaining in some detail the potential for pneumonia, they use it. Change positions every 2 hours, deep breath and cough-great way to prevent pneumonia.
kids aren't that different from adults, explain the reasoning behind something and they can figure out what to do. They are clever little things.
yeah Sylvia, kids have a lot to teach us. You mentioned you did a lot of baking. I'm really into now baking and cooking. I understand the all raw diet concept, but disagree with the premise. i think the universe is not so random as people have been taught. Each species has its part to play in the symphony, and one thing we do is wield fire. When you roast a chicken, or bake whole wheat brownies... and the home fills with that bouquet, I just don't think it all randomly worked out like that. That technology is made to do that. My grandma was doing medicine like that before I ever heard of aroma therapy. It's an alchemical transformation, bringing good spiritual forces into your home, pushing out bad ones, transforming the food...
Maybe I'm just lucky, but (knock on wood) I have no cavities and I'm 38. This might shock everyone, but we didn't go to the dentist very often when we were kids and I've occasionally suspected it was beneficial not to have all that disruptive cleaning they insist on doing. Although, I'm not sure they do that to children's teeth as much as to adults?
I believe my brothers also have no cavities, or very few.
We did eat a moderate amount of sugar as youngsters but not as much as most kids and not a whole lot of processed stuff.
@ Sylvia: You and I must be about the same age. My two oldest children are in their mid-30's, my youngest is in his mid-20's (lost one in between). One week ago today I was blessed with my third grandchild, and I had to wait for my youngest to have those! They actually have three viable and lost one last year. Following same pattern it seems, but mere coincidence. My two oldest have no interest in having their own children.
Excess amounts of drugs (especially antibiotics), processed foods and sugar stimulate an unhealthy acidic environment within our body.
“We are bombarded daily with opportunities to consume refined sugar, but overconsumption alters your body's natural pH, which should be about 7.35 or 7.45. If the pH is altered, the body has difficulty healing itself and the immune system is repressed.” http://www.onlyhealthy.com/probiotics
Consuming probiotic foods such as raw milk, including yogurt and other fermented foods will help to neutralize the body thus offsetting to a degree the overall effect of our bad eating habits.
Consuming mineral supplements including calcium and probiotic rich foods are merely a stopgap measure which also serve to offset the acidifying affect of drugs and highly processed sugar laden foods.
Maintaining a neutral soil pH is important to healthy crops and nutrient dense foods and so it is with our bodies as well in order to be healthy.
Ken
Ken, That makes sense.
"Do we really need million dollar studies to validate the truth?"
And would the studies ever see the light of day? You know, Weston Price showed over 70 years ago, with his pictures of native peoples and exams of skeletal remains, that straight teeth used to be the norm, and crooked teeth, including the third molars being out of alignment, were bone deformities, caused by a severe mineral deficiency, mainly calcium. Yet how many dentists and orthodontists today know this? Almost zero. I had my wisdom teeth pulled at age 18, because they were growing in sideways. They told me it was "bad genes". Dentists and orthodontists, like doctors today, don't know the first thing about their "area of expertise". Such is the power of the establishment propaganda machine.
Saying something is "genetic" is a broad generalization, a cop-out, shame on them for using it. Many in the health care arena say osteoporosis is "genetic" too. I beg to differ. I would hazard to guess that very few cases were "genetic". I believe it is from lack of sunshine combined by poor nutrition (or should I say deficient diets) and poor physical activities.
I never understood why they use the term "bad genes", what's "bad" about it? The human body does adapt to changes, but it takes many many generations to manifest those changes. Or, somewhere along the family tree there was an ancestor(s) who had narrow jaws, thus allowing those genes to enter the family line. It doesn't make it "bad", just different. Good nutrition will hopefully suppress any genetic defects.
Today, Dr. Cat Berg DVM and epidemiologist PHD toured OPDC for four hours during a pre-RAWMI Listing inspection. I thought our RAMP program was tight....I have six pages of comments.
The very idea that food SAFETY and biodiversity can co-exist is a conflict. Chickens, eggs, calves, cows and raw milk creameries are all elements that are very much in conflict when considering conventional FOOD Safety Standards. OPDC is closing in on becoming RAWMI Listed and I had Cat do a very critique of our RAMP program. It was a great experience and once again...I learned something. Our team will make some additional changes and our RAMP plan get even better.
Dr. Cat lives in Belgium and was in CA for the Furnace Creek 503 ultra cycling race. Her team set another world record last weekend.
Learning never stops...improvements never end.
My latest discovery is this....in the final assessment, all food safety standards are in the end reduced to human behaviors. I really detest the finite details of refining RAMP.....these are refinements that require that our team no longer associate with one another. The egg people no longer have lunch with the milkers or the creamery staff....the final safety step is the disconnection of people.
Dr. Cat and I spoke of this. The true innovation at RAWMI will be modern food safety without the disassociation of humanity. As raw milk is taken into the inner city and consumed by those that long for the immunity of those that live close to the biodiversity on the farm...this is dreamy altruism ...it is also Marler land. A place that is nirvana until some one gets sick. Then all dreams become nightmares.
How do we organic dairymen support the dreams of all consumers that seek biodiversity in their raw milks....yet are put at risk by that same biodiversity.
This is one of the greatest questions of our times.
Freedom, information and choice lay at the base of this question.
Just some thoughts on the days learning....
Pages