May 2012

Lots of people were discouraged because Sen. Rand Paul’s proposed amendment to reign in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was overwhelmingly defeated last week. It would have prohibited FDA agents from carrying weapons and making arrests as well as liberalized the rule on advertising of various foods’ health benefits.  (The amendment’s text and the vote of individual senators is shown here.)

I have a different take. I find it encouraging, first, that a senator even made this sort of proposal and, second, that 15  per cent of the senators supported it.

When I wrote about the case of parents suing Minnesota farmer Michael Hartmann in connection with their child’s alleged illness from raw milk, and the judge's suggestion the parents might bear  some responsibility for their child’s illness, I assumed the judge's intent was to reduce the potential responsibility ascribed to Hartmann. But alas, as Ron Klein reminds us in comments following the previous post, our legal system doesn’t necessarily work in such logical ways. More often than not, the idea is to ascribe blame.

So while our legal system has always provided an opening for the state to intervene to “protect” children, it’s only in recent years that the system is being slanted so aggressively this way.

 There have been many newspaper articles about raw milk over the last few years, and they nearly all use the same presentation formula. They begin with an example of a farmer producing raw milk for many happy customers. Then the narrative switches to all the warnings about raw milk’s dangers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control. They conclude with favorable quotes from raw milk drinkers and unfavorable quotes from public health officials.

 

 

Food rights proponents got another civics lesson today when Alvin Schlangen’s jury trial on four misdemeanor charges, due to begin next Monday, was put off indefinitely.

It is easy for food rights proponents who participated in protest activities in Minnesota in recent days to think they’re not being noticed. In point of fact, they are being noticed, big time.

The Hennepin County prosecutor in charge of the Alvin Schlangen trial succeeded in delaying the trial, using the excuse that a lab technician from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture due to testify about raw milk was unavailable next week.

"We will not comply!"

That was the rallying cry from Raw Milk Freedom Riders leader Liz Reitzig and 200 participants at the Minneapolis demonstration Monday in support of Alvin Schlangen.

At long last there will be a jury trial of a raw dairy provider.

After six years of legal cases involving raw dairy providers in New York (Meadowsweet Dairy), Wisconsin (Max Kane, Zinnikers, Craigs), Missouri (Morningland Dairy), and Ohio (Carol Schmitmeyer), a jury will be asked to decide the fate of Alvin Schlangen in Minnesota. In only the Ohio case did a judge rule in favor of the raw dairy provider.

 

The West Coast people got a little bit of a head start in discussing the recall of Organic Pastures Dairy Co.’s products (following my previous post). A recall, and quarantine, was ordered by the California Department of Food and Agriculture, alleging that campylobacter was found in a sample of OPDC cream, and that at least ten people became ill as a result earlier this year.

 

The Minnesota  Department of Agriculture’s campaign against consumers is significantly more widespread than I first reported. And it is stirring up a hornet’s nest of outrage, and promises of defiance.

It turns out the MDA actually sent its love letters threatening criminal charges to nine or ten consumers of farmer Michael Hartmann—nine, according to a spokesman from the MDA, and ten according to consumers who have been comparing notes among themselves.

 

The Minnesota Department of Agriculture is rapidly challenging its Wisconsin cousin as the FDA’s poster boy for how to threaten and intimidate producers and consumers of nutrient-dense foods.

In the latest episode in a two-year-long series of aggressive punitive actions, the state has sent warning letters to at least four consumers, alleging they violated Minnesota laws in connection with selling raw milk, and selling “adulterated” and “misbranded” foods.  

Now that Vermont farmer Walter Jeffries has raised $25,000 on Kickstarter to complete a new butcher shop at his Sugar Mountain Farm, he’s working on the next $5,000—to “pour the concrete for… the abattoir where we'll be able to do on-farm slaughter. “

He’s clearly taken with his success, and well he should be. Raising capital has traditionally been a very challenging task for most small businesses, and even more so for small farms. They just haven’t had the pizzazz of video game companies or businesses making some new iPhone gizmo.